The Keeper keeps the record. Wullie keeps the faith.

There is a word for the manager who names his tactics to no-one and calls it preparation, and the word is not sophisticated. It gets dressed up that way — options open, fluid, adaptable to what the game presents — and everyone in the stands who has watched football for longer than a political cycle knows exactly what the word is. It is fear. Not cowardice, which is different and rarer and excusable; fear, which is common, and which makes its home in the language of flexibility because flexibility sounds like mastery and feels nothing like it. Scotland are going into a game against Brazil tomorrow night in Miami, they need a result, and the debate about how to get it is being conducted on the radio rather than the team bus. That is the situation as filed, and the Keeper has filed it honestly, and now here's the advocate: the situation does not have to be the outcome.

Because here is what the advocate knows about committed decisions, even imperfect ones. Denmark, Hampden, November. Scotland needed a result and the management picked a way and went — pressed high, attacked from the first whistle, did not set up to defend a point when the table said a point was survivable. Four goals scored. McLean's clincher from his own half in stoppage time, which is what happens when you back yourself for ninety minutes rather than for sixty-five with a lead to protect. Morocco in Boston was a different story, and the Keeper has that story fully documented, and what it shows is not that Scotland picked the wrong approach but that the approach took seventy-one seconds to be tested and survived it no better or worse than most sides would. Conceding in the second minute to a side that held seventy-eight percent of the ball thereafter — that is a bad night, not a verdict on the method. The method never got its day in court.

The 1998 comparison sits on the file and it is fair, and Scotland fans know it in their bones the way they know a damp winter: Brazil, opening game, St-Denis, the occasion eating the match whole. But the comparison proves the case rather than defeating it. The problem in 1998 was not the decision made but the decision avoided — Scotland neither pressed with intent nor organised to absorb, moved around the event instead of through it, and finished two-one down and wondering how. The lesson of that night is not Brazil are unbeatable but the undecided team commits to nothing and gets given everything, and the advocate submits that lesson directly into evidence for the 24th. You are not being asked to solve Brazil. You are being asked to stop letting the game solve you.

So the case is simple and the case is this: pick a road. Not one road for the first hour and another when the shape breaks; one road, named, agreed, and walked by eleven men who know which direction they're facing before the whistle blows. Both answers to the tactical question are defensible — the Keeper's own filing says so, and the Keeper is not given to generosity. Defend deep and make Brazil earn every centimetre, or carry the game to them from the first whistle and see whether their backline fancies the pressure. Either is a plan. Neither requires Brazil to be something they're not. What is not a plan is meeting both options in the corridor, nodding warmly, and hoping the game presents the answer in time. It won't. The game never does. The game picks for you, and the game is not sentimental.

Wullie, Glasgow has been watching this country go to tournaments for forty-one years without a group stage exit to its credit, and he has never once believed the problem was shortage of ability or shortage of heart. It has always been this: the moment when the full weight of who you're playing lands on the chest and the instinct is to keep all doors open rather than go through one. Miami is the moment. One door. The road through it is lit.