The Keeper keeps the record. Wullie keeps the faith.

There is a particular species of suffering that no amount of character-building prepares you for, and that is the suffering of watching two other teams play a match that decides your fate while you sit in a chair having contributed nothing to the proceedings except your presence at the group stage. Scotland did not invent this predicament. They did not stumble into it blindly either. They built it — two matches, one goal scored, one conceded — with the precision of people who have studied the architecture of external dependency for twenty-eight years and decided, on balance, that they'd quite like the full experience again. Beat Haiti one-nil. Lose to Morocco one-nil. Now watch Morocco play Haiti and see what comes of it. That is the programme. Scotland put every word of it on the page.

The commission says this is a moral insult, and it is, and the advocate accepts the charge while noting that the insult has a perfectly logical author. You want to control your own destiny — fine, but controlling your own destiny requires scoring more than one goal in your first two matches. Morocco took seventy-one seconds to remove Scotland's margin for error at Foxborough: Saibari, off a Díaz pass, off a Hanley lapse, before the stadium had properly found its seat. That is the fastest goal of this World Cup, and Scotland donated it. And then they spent the remaining eighty-eight minutes absorbing seventy-eight percent possession in the first half alone — a statistic that sounds like a weather event, and by that point was. One goal down before the crowd had opened their programmes. The rest of the evening was spent being magnificent and pointless in roughly equal measure, which is a specific Scotland mode and they've never been better at it. So here we are, dependent on a result in a room we're not in, against opponents we cannot instruct, in a match whose only meaningful axis for us is Morocco's generosity toward a side we beat by a single goal ourselves. It's quite funny if you don't think about it and quite painful if you do, and the West Coast of Scotland has been thinking about it since the final whistle and the kettle's been on three times.

Here is what the advocate brings to the table, because the advocate's job is not to perform the wound but to find the working argument beneath it. The door is not closed. A point against Brazil all but confirms progression — and a narrow defeat might serve, depending on what Morocco and Haiti produce between them. Scotland have one goal in the tournament and it has been doing hard work ever since it went in, and it may yet do more. Contrast this with 1998, which the record requires mentioning: Morocco, a must-not-lose match, three-nil, total. That was a different kind of room entirely. The current situation is not that room. The current situation is a room Scotland chose to make difficult and has, as yet, not fully paid for. The mechanism is live. The file that said Denmark, must-win, November, stoppage time, sixty yards, four-two — that file belongs to this same squad, this same tournament, this same nerve-cluster of people who know what it costs to need something badly and go and take it anyway.

And so the Morocco–Haiti match is not a punishment so much as Scotland's tutorial in the thing they came here to learn. Twenty-eight years between appearances at a World Cup, and you do not arrive with full marks in patience and dependency management. You arrive ragged and grateful and slightly disbelieving, and the tournament shows you the corners you've left exposed, and this is one of them: you cannot win groups from the halfway line. Scotland scored one and conceded one. The arithmetic returned exactly what it was given. On the 24th in Miami — twenty-three hundred BST, Hard Rock Stadium, Brazil — the dependency ends one way or another, because Scotland will be back in their own room at last, doing the only thing that ever mattered, which is playing the match in front of them.

The Morocco–Haiti result is what it is. Scotland will find out. In the meantime the squad that clattered Denmark in the dark in November has not forgotten how to press the ball, and has not forgotten what it feels like to need something and be absolutely sure, in the ninety-third minute, that they are the ones who will get it.